Moonbat Sweepstakes Winner is...
There seems to be a great race on over which Moonbat can be the most offensive Joo hater. Coming down to the wire, it's neck-and-neck between Alex Cockburn, commissar over at Counterpunch, and Dennis "Justin" Raimondo, in charge over at antiwar.com.
While the competition has been tough, we think the first prize (which is a week in North Korea dining on sawdust) should go to Dennis the Menace.
The reason? Dennis is the promoter of a crackpot conspiracist "theory" which has become popular on white supremacist, Holocaust Denial, and similar web sites, according to which Israelis were the ones REALLY behind the 9-11 attacks on the World Trade Center, all designed to make those poor innocents in al-Qaeda look bad. In the cartoon world in which Raimondo lives because reality is so ugly (take a look at his photo and tell us if you still believe James Dean is dead!), it was so devious of those Israelis to get 19 Saudis to do their nefarious bidding.
Dennis is sticking to his guns and repeating this crank "theory" on his weblog page this week. Raimondo has even crayoned his own book, self-published through a "vanity publisher" named iUniverse, but you can buy it through Amazon if you really want to get your psychiatry students to analyze it.
So what exactly is Raimondo's "evidence" that dem Joos was really behind 9-11? Well, it all boils down to the arrest of a group of four Israelis (Raimondo now says five) working on a moving van in New Jersey, stopped by the FBI on September 11, 2001. The FBI thought they looked suspicious and arrested them, holding them for a while, later releasing and completely clearing them of everything except visa violations. According to some reports, the FBI suspected them because, like so many, they stood and stared at the burning buildings, giggling in shocked disbelief. I recall many of those taking Tsunami shots also giggling in shocked disbelief.
Now anyone from NY can tell you that almost all the moving van companies in the city are operated by ex-Israelis, some of them and some of their employees in the US illegally. It is not a big secret. Raimondo and the rest of the conspiracy crowd decided that the van workers picked up by the FBI, guilty perhaps of having overstayed their tourist visas, were in fact the tip of an Israeli conspiracy to topple the World Trade Center and make the poor innocent al-Qaeda take the blame.
Raimondo’s “evidence”? Well, some of the arrested Israelis had “multiple passports”, which I guess means two. [Lots of people in the US and in Israel have more than one passport.] Then, Raimondo cites "evidence" from an anti-Semitic Scottish conspiracist newspaper that one of the Israelis arrested also had over $4700 hidden in a sock. We are a little confused about how this alleged sock would prove that Israelis knocked down the World Trade Center. It looks to us more like evidence that the Israeli in question was just a bit stupid about cash or maybe did not have proper visa papers to open a legal bank account.
This is the whole "set of evidence" behind Dennis' "theory" and "book". He has never gotten around to commenting on the fact that the FBI admits it was wrong, that it had jumped the gun in arresting the moving van men, and has apologized and completely cleared them. Or have dem Joos taken over the FBI too in their nefarious meta-conspiracy? Raimondo has retracted nothing.
Raimondo is convinced that I am connected with the Kahanist movement. He proves this (to himself) by googling my name and the word "Kahanist" together, discovering two articles in which I use the word, in neither of which do I express any support for Kahanists, and both articles are merely discussions of free speech rights. I suppose I should try to stick to monosyllables in my articles so that semi-literate people like Raimondo can sound out all the words.
The biggest mystery this week is why Prof. Juan Cole is willing to serve as sidekick to Dennis and is apparently an official contributor to Raimondo's loony site. I guess he can't tell.
25 Comments:
Tell me again why the allegedly conservative Pat Buchanan hangs around with such droll human beings?
Oh yeah. That.
Wow, can you cram any more insults into this running screed if you tried?
Maybe I read the wrong theory on Justin's site, but it was never that the Israeli's knocked down the tower, but that Israeli intelligence had information on the plot and did not share it with US intelligence. Wouldn't surprise me if Israeli intelligence did have more intel than us since we had less than zero and got caught completely with our pants down. They do keep track of terrorist groups over there don't they?
It's interesting that "conspiracy theory" is tossed out in regards to the Raimondo theory (which is totally misrepresented by the serial lying blogger) from a website entitled "discoverthenetwork", which proposes the most convulted, absurd and easily disprovable "theory" I've ever seen desiminated in a semi-serious fashion (I only say "semi-serious" because it's obvious to me that the people responsible for pushing this feces don't really believe it, but have no problem using it as a tool to further their goals, behavior that is typical of unreconstructed Leninists like David Horowitz).
Of course there was NOTHING in the piece that indicated any sort of anti-semitism on the part of Cockburn or Raimondo, but hey, it's easier to smear people than attack what they said or wrote..espcially when it would reveal you to be a lying propaghandist and a fitting heir to Goebbels.
Dennis' fans are all crying that Everyone Does Not Love Raimondo. But take a look at Raimondo's "book" and then let us hear you complain that he is not a nenonazi and an anti-Semite.
Gosh, imaging Moonbat bloggers calling someone an anti-Semite just because they fabricate and spread ridiculous lies about a Jewish cabal. What nerve have they!
I did a google search on Frontpage for an in depth review of Justin's book but came up empty. Where can I find the point by point case that his book is anti-semetic and the author is a neonazi?
On Justin as anti-Semite, see
http://www.watchblog.com/republicans/archives/001384.html
and
http://www.usefulwork.com/shark/archives/000256.html
and
http://badanalysis.com/catallaxy/index.php?p=366 and http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=7499 and http://www.solomonia.com/blog/archives/000675.shtml.
Raimondo publishes his "work" on neonazi web sites like "Stormfront" and Rense.
But let's face it - there is no amount of documentation that will convince other anti-Semites to declare Justin Raimondo a neonazi.
It is hard to find reviews of Raimondo's "book" because so few people took it serious enough to review.
Prof Plaut I did read those attacks
on you in Antiwar.com. He spends even more time on Stephen Schwartz.
Schwartz gets whole posts dedicated
to him. Maybe you should be upset the noobonly gives you a paragraph.
I wish you would post the names of the five Israli Victims of 9-11. A simple examination of the list reveals plenty of Jewish names.
NYFD and NYPD require citizenship
and residency requirements. The fatalities were concentrated to the top floors. Does Raimondo want to check the hiring practices at Windows of the World and Cantor Fitzgerald ? There was only one IRS agent missing too. Maybe they were in on his fictional plot.
Pat Buchanan is no Conservative and was afiliated with Dr Lenora Fulani. His books are read by Lew Rockwell types who claim to be conservatives. I claim to play Center for the knicks. This does not make my claim real.
Stormfront and Rense run will re-publish any article that they think even slightly bolsters their opinions, both sites are notorious for running articles without the permission of their authors. I've even seen Michael Medved articles on Stormfront when it suits them, and I have a hard time believing there are any neocons who truly believe Medved is an "anti-semite"...
If it's hard to find reviews then I suggest that Frontpage review it.
Let me get this straight.
Raimondo is an anti-semite because Stormfront reprints his work on occasion without his foreknowledge, but David Horowitz is a crusader for civil rights and fairness despite his website reprinting the works of committed "racialist". Come to think of it, I guess that would make sense in a world where Justin Raimondo is a "leftist" and Pat Buchanan isn't a conservative.
disinfect..you may want to try again. I read the entire first link you posted and Raimondo was mentioned once in passing as "Israel obsessed", though no evidence of it was shown, other than a link to one of Raimondo's own columns.
I would assume that evidence of his anti-semitism-if in fact it is as clear as the Moonbatter suggests-would be easy to come by so this obviously isn't the best you can do is it? Just let me know ahead of time if I should even bother with the other links..I don't particularly want to waste my time on a wild goose chase that goes nowhere.
Dylan name the FPM Racist and do not hide.
Horowitz is not a coward this is the province of Raimondo and Lerner. I have exchanged emails with Horowitz numerous times. He responds to pithy questions.
Are you reading Elmer Raimondo's Israel,Neocon and Likud obsessed articles. Raimondo is clearly obsessed and has a severe problem.
His depiction of Plaut as a Kahnist is typical . Can I post my complaints in his forum. That is right he doesn't have one.
Typical of the totalitarian left he hides . No FPM author hides but do not get angry if they choose to spank you.
This post has been removed by the author.
>>Dylan name the FPM Racist and do not hide.
No need to hide, though you may want to actually read what I wrote, before making demands that I provide evidence of to support things that I didn't say.
For clarification I will repost the entire comment you responded to.
"Let me get this straight.
Raimondo is an anti-semite because Stormfront reprints his work on occasion without his foreknowledge, but David Horowitz is a crusader for civil rights and fairness despite his website reprinting the works of committed "racialist". Come to think of it, I guess that would make sense in a world where Justin Raimondo is a "leftist" and Pat Buchanan isn't a conservative. "
As should be clear to any honest person, I didn't accuse any FPM contributor of "racism". I did however accuse Horowitz of reprinting the works of a known "racialist" (FWIW I see little distinction between being a "racialist" and a racist, but since David himself has insisted that there is in fact a difference of sorts, I downplayed the charge of "racist" that most Americans would make). That is unquestionably true as is evidenced by this link http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=16266 Auster of course is no different than the just deceased Sam Francis or Jared Taylor (who has praised him actually).
While Raimondo is assailed for his articles being reprinted on Stormfront without his knowledge, Auster was either reprinted or given a voice in Frontpage (I have heard conflicting things on this) by Horowitz..a man allegedly apalled by racism in all forms. One doesn't have to be a partisan of any stripe to see that as the height of hypocracy..at the very least.
Speaking of Stormfront, let's see what they have to say about this Auster fellow...
Taken from http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=239460&postcount=24
Biography:
White Nationalist Lawrence Auster, a New York City freelance writer, has written what Jared Taylor of American Renaissance has described as, “the best book now available on America's immigration policy. The Path to National Suicide is an articulate, undeceived, and utterly compelling appraisal of a national policy that is quietly, relentlessly changing the very character of our nation.” Mr. Auster stated at an American Renaissance Conference, “Either blacks accept the above facts; accept a society where white Western standards of law, behavior and intellectual life are dominant and where advancement will be open for blacks only on an individual, not a collective basis; accept their status as an ethnic minority and be grateful to be living in a white society where they have goods and opportunities undreamed of in a black society; or else, if blacks are not willing to accept these things, then to avoid race warfare there must be peaceful separation between the races.”
This little paragraph is concluded with a link to racialist Bible the American Renaissance and a long piece Auster wrote for them on the "costs" of denying "race"...perhaps this doesn't much bother David Horowitz since the AR editor Jarod Taylor considers Jews to be on the good team (allow me to laugh ahead of time at the ludicrious accusation of anti-semitism that will hurled at me now, for pointing out a possible motive for Horowitz obscene hypocracy).
Auster also has written for the devoutly racialist Occidential Quarterly as if there is any room for doubt about his views on race at this point.
What's interesting is that according to Raimondo, Horowitz used similar racial extremist to ram against him in the past, namely one James Lubinskas..though Horowitz subsequently took down the piece in question, which can be found here http://www.nationalinvestor.com/Experts-Lubinskas.htm
If one would actually like to read a column by the unfairly maligned Raimondo on the topic one is available here http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j120400.html and includes links to relevant material.
>>Horowitz is not a coward this is the province of Raimondo and Lerner.
I haven't the foggiest notion what Rabbi Lerner (whom I happen to disdain) has to do with Raimondo or this, but I can attest that he is a "coward" if the standards for such a term are "one whom doesn't reply to pithy emaiils".
>>I have exchanged emails with Horowitz numerous times. He responds to pithy questions.
Horowitz has never responded to me, though I have tried to email him three times, each time with a civil tone. I don't hold it against David though. I imagine he is rather busy.
>>Are you reading Elmer Raimondo's Israel,Neocon and Likud obsessed articles.
I read antiwar.com and frontpagemagazine.com everyday. I enjoy Raimondo, though I often disagree with him. I find Horowitz columns to be embarrasing at this point, though I own Destructive Generation and Radical Son both of which I enjoy and find to be valuable books (I own "Hating Whitey" also, but find that to be full on hyperbolic and propaganda of the worst sort).
>> Raimondo is clearly obsessed and has a severe problem.
On what do you base this seemingly clinical diagnosis? Surely there must be SOMETHING you are basing this on other than columns that are often devoted to Israel in one capacity or another.
Raimondo may be "obsessed", but he clearly sees this as a monumental issue. Obsession is not in and of itself a sign of mental problems. If it was Reagan's "obsession" with communism would have in fact been the sign of insanity that much of the left suggested it was, and Horowitz himself would be a dangerously unstable man (actually there is alot more evidence to lead one to that conclusion in regards to David, considering the fact that his primary obsession is a single man, Noam Chomsky, to whom he constantly returns in much the same way that Raimondo addresses Israel).
>>His depiction of Plaut as a Kahnist is typical . Can I post my complaints in his forum. That is right he doesn't have one.
I'm not sure how exactly this is relevant to anything going on here.
>>Typical of the totalitarian left he hides .
Accusing Raimondo of being a totalitarian leftist is just about as credible as suggesting the "Jews" were behind 9/11.
>> No FPM author hides but do not get angry if they choose to spank you.
Naturally I would be enraged if a FPM author attempted to sexually assault me, but once again that has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
That said, if Horowitz, yourself or any FPM author would like to defend themselves against anything I have posted here I would welcome it. Let's just hope the basis of the defense is something stronger than the links disinfect provided above NONE of which document in ANYWAY anti-semitism on the part of Raimondo.
Dyan do you seriously read Raimondo?His obsession and mental
pathology towards Neocons,Likud and
Israel is evident in a casual reading. His Israel Knew about 9-11
scam is a modern blood libel and unpoven. Plaut and Schwartz destroy him. His attack on Plaut as a Kahanist was a disgrace.
I am glad you mentioned Lawrence Auster . I would like to see the full context of those quotes. Unlike Raimondo he doesn't hide either. I have exchanged emails with him two or three times and casualy read his blog. He responds to emails and you can post on his blog.
Will Elmer Raimondo allow me to post in his forum. Can I point out
his fixations with Neocons,Likud,
Israel and Stephen Schwartz. Schwatz kicked his tail in an FPM
Forum.
Obviously you do have some sort of reading comprehension problem as my spanking remark was a metaphor.
No FPM author is going to spank you
but they do respond at times here.
I read almost all of Horowitz work except for Hating Whitey and the New World Colusus. He is a first rate author and a gentleman.
Did you protest when Hillary spoke
about the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy? Did you protest when Elmer Raimondo goes on trips of fantasy about Neocons,Israel & Likud ? Did you protest the leftist
mania about Religious Conservatives.
DTN is a valuable resource and it sums up in one place information.
I want to respond to some allegations about ISN. Go straight
to DTN and it is in one place.
The bottom line with Horowitz's critics are free speech for me and not thee. Horowitz has every right
to call it as he sees it the same as Elmer Raimondo.
Follow the links on I sent. The Stormfront link has a link at the bottom to a huge Auster essay on the consequences of racial denial. One would think that would be enough context, though the fact that he consistently writes and contributes to exlusionary racialist websites and magazines is pretty telling about what his views on race are.
I do seriously read Raimondo, and one would assume that you do as well unless of course you just parrot criticism's of his that you have heard through FPM and other forums.
Your accusation of "obsession" is uninteresting and unimportant for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the fact that you apply it selectively, as evidenced by your failure to comment on Reagan's "obsession" with communism and Horowitz "obsession" with Chomsky.
Schwartz has done nothing to "destroy" Raimondo despite his best efforts, though he has done much to embarrass himself in recent weeks.
Hillary isn't relevant to this at all, as any sane person would freely admit. But I do regard her as a disgrace.
As for DTN...The problem with Horowitz in general and this enterprise in particular is that it delibrately misleads and lies about a point that otherwise has some validity to. I have no problem saying that there is an operating web of politicians, 527's and financiers dedicated toward tearing down Bush..just as there was in regards to Clinton. What I object to is the absurd notion that this is an all encompassing phenom that includes everyone from Noam Chomsky to Nancy Pelosi to Justin Raimondo...and furthermore that this group is collusion with Islamic radicals to destroy the country.
There is a beauty to Hillary's VRWC crap and the DTN line though. Pretending to be stupidier than you are (like Horowitz embarrasinly idiotic suggestion that all anti-war protesters were communist or their heirs), distorting things, six degree of seperation "linking" to incriminate people via association, et...In the end something is going to stick and for the stuff that falls off the accusations are usually ambigious enough to be defended via some rhetorical trick or ploy.
As for free speech, I'm all for it and havve NEVER sided with any attempt to silence any critic of my worldview. Nor will I.
Dylan lets take this slowly.
I sent Auster an email and he responded. The person I read and exchange emails with bears zero resemblence to a bigot. He will likely post his own defense. As a person that has his own blog I know about false claims and twisting words.
No Raimondo's obsession with Neocons,Likud and Isreal do not equate with Reagan or Horrowitz.
Regan was fighting a real menace that killed 100,000,000. Horowitz
has exposed Chomsky's work to scruitiny. Do you think the most widely quoted living author deserves scrutiny ? FYI he has zero polysci credentials unlike Monica Crowley. His illucid writings and ramblings deserve scrutiny just like anyone else. Dershowitz kicked his tail in a debate. I do not see him going on a show with Crowley any time soon.
The only thing Chomsky dissents from is reality.
I do not know what you are reading
but Schwartz toasts Raimondo. Raimondo gives a whiny post in response.Raimondo's attack on Plaut were scurilous.
As for DTN it is a resource for gathering information on the left.
Nobody who uses the source thinks
Ron Kuby is linked with Osama Bin Ladden. It is a resource that I use when preparing my blog.
Horrowitz has a point that seems lost on you. You tarnish FPM an excellent magazine with it ties to
Auster who will defend himself. Yet
the protesters who are organized by Known hardcore communists have no taint. Huh????? The past of Benjamin , Kagan and Lerner are entirely relevant. Few NYC protesters knew until I told them.
They were shocked and critical of Answer and Code Pink. There is a double standard that KKK is evil and Communists are not. Excuse me I wouldn't be caught within two miles of a protest that included the KKK. FYI did the KKK kill 100,000,000 ? Thats right communism did that. Game set match
Horowitz.
Dylan
In case you failed to notice Elmer Raimondo is dealing with an imaginary conspiracy. The connections he makes are a product
of mental illness. Were anyone else to make up similar conspicies
they would be laughed into an a padded room.
Communism was quite real ask the 100,000,000 who died from it. You
can ask the almost 2,000,000,000 people who lived under it. There are plenty of expatriates in the states. They are quite clear on the subject.
Horowitz work on Chomsky is also quite real. His accademic malfeasance and distorted views deserve scruitiny. The fact that any student should read them outside of his works in linguistics
speaks vollumes about what is wrong
with our univerities.
The point being that Horowitz and Reagan dealt with real problems.
Raimondo lives in an Elmer Fudd fantasy world.
Raimondo: OOOOHHHH I hate the wascaly Jewish Weeepulicans Hahaha.
There is a neocon under my bed. Them wascal Shawon wikudnicks are wunning and wuining Amerwika Haha.
The Jewish media won't weeport the twuth hahahaha.
Yes I do read Raimondo for comic relief. He is about as articulate
as your average cartoon character.
Any comparison to Stepen Schwartz
is an insult as Schwartz can write and is clearly intelligent.
This post has been removed by the author.
About Plaut, is his blogger profile correct that he lives and works in Israel?
http://www.blogger.com/profile/6793533
Okay.
We have taken this "slowly" and the conclusion you have drawn is that Auster isn't a bigot because you exchanged emails with him and he didn't seem like one. Weighing that against the evidence that he has repeaditly lent his words to "racialist" causes, magazines, et. is apparently beyond your intellectual capabilities...either that or it's something you refuse to accept regardless of the available documentation. Read this http://www.amren.com/948issue/948issue.html and come to your own conclusions.
The rest of your comments are all over the place and hard to find much value you in. Yes the authoratarian left is bad. Yes communism is not treated with the same contempt in some circles that Nazism is.
You continue to drag in total irrelevancy, like Monica Crowley's political science academic acheivments, for reasons unknown.
Frankly I'm not sure what your tirade was trying to get at. You ignorantly and reflexively assume that I am a Left winger of some sort who has not been critical of Kagan, ANSWER, et. which is totally false. You tried to do the same thing by tossing around Hillary, apparently assuming that I was a Clintonite. Your assumptions are embarrasing you, espcially when it would be much easier to read the Auster items in question and comment directly on the veracity or lack thereof of my charges. Instead you change the subject, likely because you are too lazy and intellectually dishonest to confront the possibility that a perennial fraud and first class hypocrit like David Horowitz, may himself be guilty of using racial extremist as his pointmen in the war against Raimondo.
What communism "did" or didn't do, does not excuse the continued hypocracy and propaganda that exudes from FPM and Horowitz.
I posted with Auster and he hopefully will post what he emailed
me. He does not need me to defend his words. There is nothing racialist on his blog.
Dr Monica Crowley is relevant as she has a Poly Sci doctorate unlike Chomsky a linguist.Ann Coulter also has more credentials as a lawyer. Chomsky has zero credentials outside linguistics.
Chomsky has based his career on fraud and a cult like following that is largely illucid.
Horowitz DTN is a reasearch resource. Nobody with an IQ thinks
that Osama and John Kerrry are connected. It provides a home for researchers.
As far as I am concerned he is 100%
correct about bigotry on the left.
I live in NYC and meet these types
all the time. I had an infestation
of them on my blog and loved it.
Read the comments on my blog is ethnicity flexible.
DH is a giant and a prophet. The antics of the hard left deserve exposure. Would you be this blase
about Nazis ? Would the MSM be as blase I do not thin so ?
I do hope Auster responds here.
Your Horowtiz idolotry is sad, pathetic and comical coming just lines after you attack Chomsky and his "cult". Though I disagree with David on many, many things, I do think that in the past he has made very useful and critical accounts of the American Left (though he has always had a tendency toward hyperbole and speculation). He ceased being a serious commentator when the hyperbole overtook the serious criticism as the dominant theme of his work and when he started pretending to be stupidier than he really is in order to falsely link conflicting ideologies, people and causes as part of a monolithic entity that wishes to destroy the country. In other words when he decided that his lifes work was active lying and propaganda instead of serious criticism.
I would love for Auster to come and defend his ties to Occidential Quartley, AmRen, and his own published words on racial issues. I'm sure he would at least engage the issue of whether or not he is a racialist and explain his ties and work for racialist publications. That would be a welcome return to the issue, since you have chosen to ignore the links I have provided to the mans own works (probably out of cowardice, which hilariously is what you accuse Raimondo and co. of).
The "connection" issue to Islamic radicals is covered today by David Horowitz in the brief interview published on FPM.
Taken from www.frontpagemagazine.com
"What I've shown is that there are only a couple of degrees of separation between anybody on the left and the terrorists -- and that includes people in the Democratic Party, even those who are anti-terrorist. "
At the end of the piece Horowitz attempts to backup a bit from the implications of this statement, but heavily qualifies it and uses an extreme example to ram home the point.
Q: Some critics have accused you of implying connections or comparisons between, say, Katie Couric and al-Qaeda. What do you make of such charges?
A: This comes from people who are incapable of reading, who are uninterested in dealing with serious intellectual arguments.
Katie Couric is listed [on the website] as an "affective leftist" -- someone who leans left because in the media culture she inhabits, that's the "decent" thing to do. There is no link between Katie Couric and al-Qaeda stated or implied in this database.
If you were to make a database of communism, you'd put Trotsky in there with Stalin, even though Stalin ordered Trotsky's murder."
Of course as Horowitz notes Couric is listed as an "affective leftist"..your choice of Kerry is listed as a "leftist" and would seemingly be willingly in compliance with Islamic radicals. If not, why the distinction at all?
As for Crowley, of course she isn't relevant, nor is the disgusting pro-terrorist Ann Coulter. What is interesting though is your Stalinist insistance that those that aren't 'experts" in a field should not be treated seriously when they comment on it. Naturally thatis an excellent way of ignoring what is said, what documentation they may have et. It is also a devolution politically to pre-Lockean "conservativsm" which is basically an advocacy of the feudal system, something civilized people discarded hundred years ago.
Auster has not been afiliated with Amren for ten years. He left over
the direction of the movement towards acceptace of a Neo Nazi element.
I read his blog and have irregular
emails with Auster. Writers tend to shift identities Horowitz, Raimondo, Schwartz and Auster have moved . If communists with far more blood on their hands can move into the mainstream Auster is entitled. I encourage you to post your concerns on his blog.
Your comments about Stalinism are amusing . My dedication to Anticomunism has been life long. I am not a neocon as I always was a cold war moderate Republican.
I explained the points early about how to use DTN. This is before the material was posted. Do I respect and admire DH ? Absolutely he provides needed light on a problem
with DTN. You seem to have a severe reading comprehension problem. A simple reading of DTN issustrates it is a resource.I regularly use the site.
Chomsky is a crank and would last about five minutes with a trained Poly Sci person like Dr Monica Crowley. Chomsky's delusions are fit for sanitary aplications .
Sorry your version of conservatism
is not in vouge. FYI I am a RUDY Republican
For the record I do not indentify myself as a leftist or a conservative at this point, nor do I have a "brand" that I am trying to push on anyone.
As for Auster..he's taken it upon himself to defend far rightists and racialist in recent years, long after he left the AmRen fold.
It's also interesting to note that his best defense of his behavior apparently is "AmRen got too cozy with Nazi's", not "AmRen is a devout Racialist magazine" which it always has been.
If you don't want to be called a Stalinist, don't push Stalinist views.
Post a Comment
<< Home