Dem-Roe-Crats
By selecting Howard Dean as Democratic National Committee chairman last weekend, were Democrats revealing a subconscious death wish?
The Democratic Party’s decline and eventual extinction as a political force, some have observed, is evident in the "Roe Effect," the much higher rate of abortion in liberal blue states than in conservative red ones since the Supreme Court ruling Roe vs. Wade. The resulting blue state population decline is already producing an electoral vote shift to Republican states.
Howard Dean, M.D., has been an accelerator of this Roe Effect. He was, as a FrontPageMagazine.com investigation revealed, on the board of Planned Parenthood in Vermont and during his 2003-04 presidential race opposed putting any restrictions on abortion, including the procedure known as “partial-birth abortion.”
An analysis of the Democratic Party’s ideology at DiscoverTheNetwork.org reports that Dean as a physician worked in 1978-79 in a Planned Parenthood Clinic in Burlington. After refusing to answer the obvious question for months, Dr. Dean told reporters he had not performed any abortions himself. He did not say whether he had counseled or helped arrange any patient’s abortion.
With Dr. Dean as the DNC’s new chief operator, perhaps we should rename this self-extinguishing, demographically-doomed organization the Dem-Roe-cratic Party.
2 Comments:
Mr. Ponte,
Here is something to compare the Roe effect to.
The Southern Poverty Law Center offers a map of hate groups monitored in the United States in 2003.
Compare that map with the U.S. Presidential Election 2004 map.Now, analyze the population of each state and whether the state went red or blue, and by what percentage of the population.
Research is ongoing, but here is a quick breakdown of what the data shows:
California voted Democrat at 54% of the population.
Texas voted Republican at 61%, Georgia at 58%, South Carolina at 58% of their respective populations.
1. Calif. has 45 identified hate groups, and a population of 35.48 mil.
2. Texas has 53 identified hate groups, and a population of 22.11 million.
3. Georgia has 53 identified hate groups, and a population of 8.68 million.
4. South Carolina has 45 identified hate groups, and a population of 4.14 million.
Note the population of Calif. is roughly the same as the total population of Texas, Georgia and South Carolina, and yet the number of identified hate groups in these 3 states is over 3 times that of California.
Country wide, the total number of hate groups in RED states is 553, and the total number of hate groups in BLUE states comes in at 218.
This comparison alone reveals hate groups in RED states vs. BLUE states is just under 3 to 1.
As noted here, DTN - SPLC the SPLC is just a racket that labels any organization that doesn't toe their far-left party line as a "hate group." They do this as a fundraising gimmick to get naifs to part with their money.
Quoting the SPLC's claims about anything makes about as much sense as quoting a freakshow barker's claims about what horrors they have on display in their tent. You've got to be kidding yourself if you think anybody with a brain takes the SPLC's drivel seriously.
Post a Comment
<< Home